XOM • Energy • Oil & Gas Integrated
Exxon Mobil is one of the world's largest energy companies, managing everything from drilling for oil to refining it into gasoline and chemicals. It retains a "wide moat," meaning it has a strong, durable competitive advantage built on its massive size and efficiency that is difficult for rivals to copy.
Exxon Mobil Corporation is a global energy titan that manages the entire value chain, from upstream oil and gas extraction to downstream refining and chemical manufacturing. As a dominant industry supermajor, the company leverages its massive scale and technical expertise to maintain a wide economic moat, ensuring operational efficiency that remains resilient through volatile commodity price cycles. While its core business provides the energy and petrochemicals essential to the global economy, Exxon is strategically pivoting toward the future by investing heavily in carbon capture, hydrogen, and lithium production. These initiatives are designed to secure the company’s long-term viability amidst the global energy transition. For investors, Exxon represents a blend of traditional energy stability and forward-looking innovation, balancing its massive existing infrastructure with the capital-intensive R&D required to navigate a lower-carbon future.
Grade Scale: 1 (Best / Green) to 10 (Weakest / Red)
Outer edge = stronger. The six pillars behind the grade above.
Exxon Mobil is currently facing a period of cooling profits as energy prices fluctuate, making the stock look expensive compared to its recent performance. While the company remains a massive, stable industry giant, the current price is higher than what its underlying earnings justify, suggesting a lack of a 'margin of safety' or a protective price buffer for investors.
Exxon Mobil operates as a foundational energy infrastructure entity, yet it currently faces a cyclical contraction characterized by shrinking operating margins, which have compressed from over 12% to 6.36%. This margin erosion, coupled with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.80, creates a structural tension between the company’s massive asset base and its current inability to translate revenue into consistent bottom-line growth. While the balance sheet remains solvent, the recent 35.66% quarterly decline in net income highlights the firm's extreme sensitivity to commodity price volatility. Technical indicators reflect this uncertainty, with the stock trapped in a bearish moving average arrangement and trading below its 20-day and 60-day averages. The current valuation, reflected in a P/E ratio of 22.7 and a P/S ratio significantly above historical norms, suggests that market expectations are decoupled from the reality of the current energy cycle. The core tension lies in the disconnect between the company's long-term potential in carbon capture and its immediate struggle to maintain profitability in a cooling demand environment. Without a recovery in operating margins or a significant shift in global crude benchmarks, the stock remains vulnerable to further valuation compression as the market adjusts for the lack of a margin of safety.
The stock is currently trading within the Bollinger Bands, suggesting a neutral volatility regime. With the RSI at 42.3, momentum is cooling without reaching oversold territory. The MACD remains below zero, indicating a weak bearish trend. Price action is currently capped by the mid-Bollinger band at $139.88.
The bearish moving average arrangement (MA5 < MA20 < MA60) signals a structural downtrend. A recovery requires the price to reclaim the 60-day moving average, currently acting as resistance. Sustained earnings beats are necessary to reverse the current negative net income growth trend and improve the PEG ratio.
Long-term positioning depends on the stock price converging toward the intrinsic value estimate of $115. A valuation-compression scenario is likely if operating margins remain below 7%. Compounding potential is tied to the company's ability to pivot its massive infrastructure toward new energy revenue streams while maintaining dividend stability.
Five numbers professional analysts usually check before anything else. Tap a card to jump to that line in the tables below.
Net income fell about 24% year-over-year — worth checking whether the drop is one-off or structural. The operating margin narrowed from 12.1% to 6.4% over the past year — each sale brings home less profit than before.
Grew revenue year over year in 3 of 8 recent quarters (growth swung by about 6 points quarter to quarter); beat consensus in 7 of 8, surprises widening.
A quick read on how consistently recent quarters grew and how often reported results cleared analyst consensus — a look back at the track record, not a forecast.
Next scheduled earnings report: 2026-08-07
Each chip is one reported quarter: whether earnings per share came in above ("Beat"), below ("Miss"), or in line with the average analyst estimate at the time, and by what percentage. This is a historical record of past reports, not an indicator of future results.
Calculates structural allocation and relative weights. Balance Sheet items are scaled against Total Assets; Income Statement items are scaled against Total Revenues.
| Financial Parameter | 2023 Q2 ($M) | 2023 Q3 ($M) | 2023 Q4 ($M) | 2024 Q1 ($M) | 2024 Q2 ($M) | 2024 Q3 ($M) | 2024 Q4 ($M) | 2025 Q1 ($M) | 2025 Q2 ($M) | 2025 Q3 ($M) | 2025 Q4 ($M) | 2026 Q1 ($M) | Health Rating | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | 80,795.0 | 88,570.0 | 81,688.0 | 80,411.0 | 89,986.0 | 87,792.0 | 81,058.0 | 81,058.0 | 79,477.0 | 83,331.0 | 80,039.0 | 83,161.0 | ||
| Operating Income | 9,950.0 (12.3%) | 11,844.0 (13.4%) | 8,458.0 (10.4%) | 9,941.0 (12.4%) | 10,896.0 (12.1%) | 11,042.0 (12.6%) | 7,773.0 (9.6%) | 9,846.0 (12.1%) | 8,911.0 (11.2%) | 9,178.0 (11.0%) | 6,003.0 (7.5%) | 5,285.0 (6.4%) | ||
| Net IncomeKey | 7,880.0 (9.8%) | 9,070.0 (10.2%) | 7,630.0 (9.3%) | 8,220.0 (10.2%) | 9,240.0 (10.3%) | 8,610.0 (9.8%) | 7,610.0 (9.4%) | 7,713.0 (9.5%) | 7,082.0 (8.9%) | 7,548.0 (9.1%) | 6,501.0 (8.1%) | 4,183.0 (5.0%) | ||
| Total Assets | 363,248.0 | 372,259.0 | 376,317.0 | 377,918.0 | 460,707.0 | 461,916.0 | 453,475.0 | 451,908.0 | 447,597.0 | 454,340.0 | 448,980.0 | 464,410.0 | ||
| Total Liabilities | 156,251.0 (43.0%) | 164,726.0 (44.3%) | 163,779.0 (43.5%) | 164,866.0 (43.6%) | 184,441.0 (40.0%) | 185,516.0 (40.2%) | 182,869.0 (40.3%) | 182,102.0 (40.3%) | 177,635.0 (39.7%) | 186,117.0 (41.0%) | 182,354.0 (40.6%) | 203,414.0 (43.8%) | ||
| Total Equity | 199,046.0 (54.8%) | 199,703.0 (53.6%) | 204,802.0 (54.4%) | 205,250.0 (54.3%) | 268,405.0 (58.3%) | 268,592.0 (58.1%) | 263,705.0 (58.2%) | 262,720.0 (58.1%) | 262,593.0 (58.7%) | 260,561.0 (57.3%) | 259,386.0 (57.8%) | 254,381.0 (54.8%) |
| Ratio Category | Metric | 2023 Q2 | 2023 Q3 | 2023 Q4 | 2024 Q1 | 2024 Q2 | 2024 Q3 | 2024 Q4 | 2025 Q1 | 2025 Q2 | 2025 Q3 | 2025 Q4 | 2026 Q1 | Health Rating | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profitability | ROE (%)Key | 3.96 | 4.54 | 3.73 | 4.00 | 3.44 | 3.21 | 2.89 | 2.94 | 2.70 | 2.90 | 2.51 | 1.64 | ||
| ROA (%) | 2.17 | 2.44 | 2.03 | 2.18 | 2.01 | 1.86 | 1.68 | 1.71 | 1.58 | 1.66 | 1.45 | 0.90 | |||
| Operating Margin (%)Key | 12.32 | 13.37 | 10.35 | 12.36 | 12.11 | 12.58 | 9.59 | 12.15 | 11.21 | 11.01 | 7.50 | 6.36 | |||
| Stability | Debt-to-EquityKey | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.80 | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.48 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.04 | |||
| Growth | Revenue Growth Rate (YoY %)Key | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.38 | -0.88 | -0.77 | 2.54 | -3.31 | -4.40 | -4.52 | -4.09 | ||
| Net Income Growth Rate (YoY %) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 17.26 | -5.07 | -0.26 | 1.14 | -9.21 | -11.12 | -14.36 | -23.69 | |||
| Activity | Total Asset Turnover | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||
| Valuation (Current) | P/E Ratio (Trailing) | 22.70 | — | ||||||||||||
| P/B Ratio | 2.26 | — | |||||||||||||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.07 | — | |||||||||||||
| Trailing EPS ($) | 6.05 | — | |||||||||||||
A quick read on how good the business is underneath the share price: how much of each sale it keeps, how much cash it turns that into, how well it earns on the money invested, and how comfortably it carries its debt. Each figure is on a trailing-twelve-month basis, with the trend across recent quarters.
| Metric | TTM | Health Rating | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.5% | ||
| Return on invested capital (ROIC) | 7.9% | ||
| Free cash flow margin | 5.8% | ||
| FCF conversion | 74.2% | ||
| Interest coverage | 42.4× | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.7× |
Trailing-twelve-month figures from reported financials, shown for education, not as advice. A metric is omitted when the underlying data isn't available.
A nine-point checklist of whether the fundamentals are getting stronger or weaker year over year — grouped into profitability, leverage and liquidity, and efficiency. Each dot is one test the company either passes or fails; more filled dots means more of the checks are trending the right way. It describes momentum in the reported numbers, not a signal to act on.
6/9 — improving quality
Each check compares the latest period with a year earlier using reported financials, and is shown for education, not as advice. A check whose data is missing counts as not passed.
Each financial metric is evaluated dynamically against standard industry benchmarks, mapping from Tier 1 (Outstanding) to Tier 10 (Critical Risk).
Exxon Mobil is currently facing a dip in profits as energy prices fluctuate, though it remains a massive player in global fuel and chemical production. The company is working to manage its debt while balancing traditional oil operations with future-focused investments in lower-emission technologies.
Ecosystem Summary: Exxon Mobil operates through Upstream, Energy Products, and Chemical Products segments. The company focuses on crude oil and natural gas extraction, refined petroleum products like gasoline and lubricants, and high-performance chemical building blocks for industrial use.
Customer Feedback: Brand loyalty remains strong among industrial partners and commercial clients who rely on Exxon's consistent supply chain. While retail fuel customers are primarily price-sensitive, the company retains high retention rates through its widespread service station network.
Competitor Grid: Exxon competes with major integrated energy firms like Chevron and Shell. It differentiates itself through massive operational scale and a heavy focus on integrated value chains, though it faces similar cyclical pressures as other global oil majors.
Pipeline Strategy: Exxon is heavily investing in carbon capture, hydrogen, and lithium production to diversify its portfolio. These R&D efforts aim to ensure long-term viability as the global energy landscape shifts toward lower-carbon alternatives.
Exxon Mobil is a massive energy giant that stays profitable by operating on a global scale, though its earnings can swing wildly with oil prices. Its competitive advantage comes from its sheer size and ability to manage complex, multi-billion dollar projects that few other companies can handle.
Moat Rating: Wide Moat
Exxon Mobil possesses a Wide Moat, primarily driven by its massive scale, operational efficiency, and technical expertise in capital-intensive projects. This advantage is highly durable, as the global energy transition will likely take decades, ensuring continued demand for its core products. Its ability to navigate commodity price cycles suggests long-term stability over the next 10-20 years.
Exxon Mobil is a massive energy company that finds, refines, and reduces oil and chemicals. While it remains a global leader, recent profits have dipped due to market volatility, signaling a period of adjustment for the business.
Definition: Exxon Mobil operates in the Oil & Gas Integrated industry. The company manages the entire energy value chain, from upstream exploration and extraction to downstream refining, chemical manufacturing, and the marketing of petroleum products.
Market Positioning: As one of the world's largest publicly traded energy firms, Exxon Mobil competes with global supermajors like Chevron, Shell, and BP. Its market position is defined by its massive scale, integrated operations, and extensive global infrastructure.
Exxon Mobil is currently navigating a period of lower profits and rising debt, which has pressured its financial performance. While the company continues to return cash to investors through buybacks, the recent decline in margins suggests management faces significant challenges in maintaining its historical efficiency.
Background & Experience: Exxon Mobil’s leadership, led by CEO Darren Woods, is characterized by a long-tenured, internal-promotion culture. The team is widely viewed as disciplined and operationally focused, prioritizing traditional energy stability over rapid, speculative pivots.
Capital Allocation: Capital allocation remains heavily focused on massive share buybacks and dividends. However, recent data shows declining operating margins and a rising debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that current capital deployment is becoming less efficient relative to the company's historical performance.
Innovation Adaptability: The company maintains a cautious, pragmatic approach to the energy transition. Rather than aggressive diversification, management focuses on carbon capture and low-carbon solutions that leverage their existing infrastructure, prioritizing long-term reliability over rapid technological disruption.
Governance Risk: Key risks include the heavy reliance on commodity price cycles and the potential for long-term stranded assets. Compensation structures are heavily tied to performance metrics, which may incentivize short-term cash flow generation over necessary long-term structural changes.
Shareholder Alignment (Lynch & Munger): Management demonstrates a strong commitment to returning capital, evidenced by a significant 6.25% reduction in share count. However, the lack of recent insider accumulation and consistent insider reduction suggest a lack of aggressive personal conviction from leadership.
| Date | Insider / Position | Type | Shares | Value ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 |
Buchanan Susan Elaine
officer: VP - CAO & Controller
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-07-01 |
Buchanan Susan Elaine
officer: VP - CAO & Controller
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-07-01 |
Buchanan Susan Elaine
officer: VP - CAO & Controller
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-07-01 |
Fox Leonard M.
officer
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-07-01 |
Chapman James R.
officer
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-05-27 |
UBBEN JEFFREY W
director:
|
0 | - | |
| 2026-03-16 |
Talley Darrin L
officer: VP - Corp Strategic Planning
|
S-Sale | 1,080 | $167,935 |
| 2026-03-02 |
Talley Darrin L
officer: VP - Corp Strategic Planning
|
S-Sale | 2,150 | $339,313 |
| 2026-02-09 |
Talley Darrin L
officer: VP - Corp Strategic Planning
|
S-Sale | 3,230 | $481,835 |
| 2026-02-02 |
Talley Darrin L
officer: VP - Corp Strategic Planning
|
S-Sale | 650 | $90,841 |
Exxon Mobil is currently priced at a premium compared to its industry peers, despite recent pressure on its profit margins. The company remains financially stable, but investors are paying a higher price for each dollar of earnings than they are for similar energy companies.
Valuation Verdict: The stock is Overvalued. It trades at a significant premium to its peers, specifically a 132.9% premium on a price-to-sales basis. Given the recent contraction in operating margins and the lack of a margin of safety, the current market price reflects high expectations that the company's recent financial performance does not fully support.
Exxon Mobil is a massive, established energy company that rises and falls with the global price of oil. Because its profits depend heavily on these unpredictable energy markets, the stock behaves like a classic cyclical investment that moves in waves.
Exxon Mobil is a massive, long-standing energy company that is currently seeing its profits shrink due to fluctuating oil prices. While the business is stable and owns valuable physical assets, it is facing a challenging period where its margins are tightening.
The same company set side by side with close competitors, so its size and valuation have context.
| Company | Market cap | P/E | P/S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil Corporation This stock
XOM |
$569.39B | 22.7 | 1.7 |
| BP p.l.c.
BP |
$101.10B | 31.6 | 0.5 |
| Cenovus Energy Inc.
CVE |
$48.45B | 10.4 | 1.0 |
| Chevron Corporation
CVX |
$346.64B | 31.5 | 1.9 |
| Ecopetrol S.A.
EC |
$31.64B | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Peer median | — | 21.0 | 0.8 |
| vs. peers | — | +8.3% | +132.9% |
P/E (price-to-earnings) is the share price divided by earnings per share — a rough gauge of how expensive a stock is relative to its profits.
The "vs. peers" row shows how the company's valuation multiples compare to the peer median — green is a discount (cheaper than peers), red a premium (more expensive).
The peer table shows how the company is priced against rivals; this shows how it is priced against its own past. Each bar places today's multiple within the range it has traded over the window below — near the left is cheap for this stock, near the right is dear.
P/E 22.7 — 89th percentile of its own 2-yr range
EV/EBITDA 10.2 — 89th percentile of its own 2-yr range
Middle-half range (25th–75th percentile)
Each quarter-end multiple pairs that quarter's trailing-twelve-month earnings or EBITDA with the period-end price; the marker is where today's multiple sits within that history. Shown for education, not as advice, and only when enough history is available.
Annual dividend as a percentage of the share price — your cash return from dividends alone. Share of earnings paid out as dividends. Below ~60% generally leaves room to keep paying and growing it.
Drag the sliders to set your own assumptions and watch the estimated fair value update live. Fair value is what the business could be worth based on the cash it generates — a discounted cash flow (DCF) estimate, not a price target.
At today's price the market is implying ~12.0%/yr free-cash-flow growth for 10 years; the company's trailing free-cash-flow growth was -33.3%.
A simplified, transparent model for learning — it isn't financial advice, and small input changes move the result a lot. That sensitivity is the point: it shows how much a valuation depends on assumptions.
Exxon Mobil is currently in a cooling-off period after a period of volatility, showing signs of stabilizing rather than moving sharply in either direction. This pause suggests the stock is finding its footing as the recent downward pressure loses intensity.
Bearish trend structure with nascent momentum recovery in a consolidation phase.
XOM exhibits a structural bearish alignment as short-term moving averages remain positioned beneath long-term benchmarks, reflecting a broader corrective phase. While the price remains trapped below its primary moving averages, a nascent bullish crossover in the MACD suggests a potential exhaustion of recent reduction pressure. The RSI remains in neutral territory, indicating a lack of extreme sentiment as the stock trades comfortably within its Bollinger Band range. Current volume patterns lack conviction, pointing to a period of retail-driven consolidation rather than institutional accumulation or distribution. With the price positioned in the mid-range of its annual cycle, the current volatility regime remains stable. This confluence of indicators suggests a market in transition, awaiting a catalyst to resolve the current structural divergence.
52-Week Range Position
45% (-22.1% from high)
Trailing Returns (1M / 3M / 6M)
-9.5% • -12.1% • +13.5%
Volatility Regime
Normal Volatility
MA Extension (vs SMA20 / SMA60)
-1.8% • -6.8%
Arrange Structure: Strong Bearish Arrangement (MA5 < MA20 < MA60)
Crossover Signals: Neutral (No recent crossover)
SMA(5): $138.74 • SMA(20): $139.88 • SMA(60): $147.40
RSI (14-day): Neutral (42.3)
MACD Line: Weak Bullish (MACD Line crossed above Signal Line but remains below 0)
Bollinger Bands: Upper $148.05 • Mid $139.88 • Lower $131.71
Volume Trend Profile: Steady Volume (10-day volume is within 20% of the 30-day average)
Price-Volume Correlation: Weak/No Correlation (-0.07): Price changes and volume fluctuations are decoupled, indicating retail consolidation.
| Trigger Date | Spike Volume | Multiplier | Close Price | Price Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | 48,063,443 | 2.67x | $137.81 | -2.08% |
| 2025-12-19 | 45,412,814 | 2.70x | $116.69 | +0.13% |
Exxon Mobil is currently experiencing a cooling-off period after a period of growth. While the company remains a solid long-term dividend payer, investors are waiting for clearer signals before jumping back in as the stock price stabilizes.
Integrated Sentiment Verdict: The sentiment is neutral to cautious. While the company's long-term dividend history and production investments are viewed positively, recent price action and earnings revisions have tempered immediate enthusiasm.
Market psychology is currently cautious. With the stock in a bearish moving average arrangement but showing signs of a potential MACD turnaround, the near-term outlook remains neutral as investors await concrete Q2 earnings results.
Exxon Mobil is currently facing a profit squeeze as its operating margins shrink, making the stock more expensive relative to its earnings. While the company remains a massive energy player, recent results show it is struggling to maintain its previous levels of efficiency and profitability.
Economic Cycle alignment: Exxon is a classic cyclical company, meaning its performance rises and falls with the health of the global economy. It is currently in a challenging phase where slowing revenue growth and contracting margins reflect a cooling economic cycle. Investors should view it as a commodity-linked stock that thrives during periods of high industrial activity and expansion.
GDP, Inflation, Interest Rates: As an energy producer, Exxon is highly sensitive to GDP growth, which drives global demand for oil and refined products. While rising interest rates typically increase borrowing costs, Exxon’s substantial cash position and manageable debt-to-equity ratio of 0.80 provide a buffer. Inflation impacts the company by raising operational costs, which has contributed to the recent decline in operating margins to 6.36%.
Exxon operates under intense regulatory scrutiny regarding carbon emissions and environmental standards. Fiscal policies, such as potential changes to corporate tax rates or energy subsidies, directly impact its bottom line. The company must navigate shifting industrial policies that favor renewable energy transitions, forcing it to balance traditional fossil fuel extraction with investments in lower-carbon technologies to remain compliant.
Exxon is primarily a B2B enterprise, as its revenue is driven by industrial demand for fuels, chemicals, and lubricants rather than direct consumer retail habits. Consequently, the company is more sensitive to the capex cycles of global manufacturing and transportation sectors. As these industries modernize, Exxon’s downstream demand depends on the pace of global industrial expansion and infrastructure development.
Exxon is heavily exposed to global supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions, which often cause volatility in commodity prices. Because it operates internationally, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar affect its export competitiveness and the cost of foreign operations. Trade regulations and international sanctions on oil-producing nations significantly influence the global supply-demand balance for its core products.