Sample report Analysis as of 2026-07-10 An example of the research note Stock Insight creates for any listed company. Figures reflect the date this sample was generated, not live market data. The first report each month is free. Create a free account
Stock Insight

Microsoft Corporation

MSFT • Technology • Software - Infrastructure

Financial Health
8 / 10
Economic Moat
Wide Moat
1-Year Target
$460.00

Company Overview

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is a global technology leader that provides the essential software and cloud computing services used by most businesses and individuals today. By embedding its tools into the daily operations of companies worldwide, it has built a highly stable and profitable foundation for long-term growth.

Microsoft Corporation serves as the digital backbone of the global economy, providing essential cloud infrastructure, enterprise software, and productivity tools. The company generates revenue through three primary pillars: its dominant Intelligent Cloud platform, Azure; its ubiquitous Office and LinkedIn productivity suites; and its personal computing and gaming division. Microsoft maintains a wide economic moat—a durable competitive advantage—driven by high customer switching costs and deep integration across its ecosystem. By positioning itself as the primary partner for enterprise digital transformation, the firm has secured a leadership role in the cloud and software infrastructure industry. Looking ahead, Microsoft is aggressively investing in artificial intelligence to enhance its existing product suite and maintain its technological edge. This strategic focus on AI-integrated services, combined with its massive scale and diversified income streams, positions the company to remain a foundational player in the evolving tech landscape for the next decade.

Investment Grade

2 /10
Outperform
Risk: Low

Grade Scale: 1 (Best / Green) to 10 (Weakest / Red)

Analysis Profile

Outer edge = stronger. The six pillars behind the grade above.

Executive Synthesis

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft remains a highly profitable industry leader with a strong foundation, though its stock price is currently experiencing a period of calm after a long climb. The company’s massive cash reserves and essential role in business technology provide a safety net that helps protect its value even when the broader market fluctuates.

Microsoft functions as a foundational utility for the global digital economy, characterized by a wide economic moat derived from its deeply embedded enterprise software and cloud infrastructure. The current quantitative synthesis reveals a company with exceptional operating margins near 46%, which provides a robust buffer against macroeconomic volatility and rising capital costs. While recent net income figures have shown periodic fluctuations, the underlying cash generation remains strong, supported by a conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 0.68. The core tension lies between the company's high-quality fundamental performance and the current technical consolidation, where the stock is trading within a neutral range relative to its 52-week highs. Macroeconomic cycles, specifically the sustained demand for B2B cloud services, act as a structural tailwind that offsets potential softness in consumer-facing segments. The alignment of these factors suggests that the current valuation offers a margin of safety, as the market appears to be discounting the company's long-term compounding potential. The integration of AI into the existing software ecosystem serves as a primary catalyst for future margin expansion. Ultimately, the thesis rests on the sustainability of these high margins and the company's ability to maintain its dominant market position despite the current technical cooling period.

Forecast Confidence
75%
Primary Moat Engine
Wide Moat

Price Targets & Range

Current Price: $384.36
1-Month Outlook: Direction: Neutral; Volatility: Low to Moderate; Expected Range: $370.00 - $400.00.
3-Month Outlook: Direction: Slightly Bullish; Volatility: Moderate; Expected Range: $380.00 - $425.00.
1-Year Targets:
High $520.00
Median $460.00
Low $360.00

Automated Analysis & Hypothetical Scenarios

⚡ Short-term Volatility Profile

The stock currently resides within a neutral Bollinger Band range between $357 and $405. MACD signals indicate a weak bullish trend, yet the price remains below the 60-day moving average. Structural support is observed near $350, while resistance is established at the $405 level.

📊 Mid-term Position Profile

The trend structure is currently in a consolidation phase relative to the 20-day and 60-day moving averages. A sustained move above the $405 resistance level would signal a shift in momentum. Conversely, a breach of the $350 support level would indicate a potential re-evaluation of the current valuation floor.

💎 Long-term Value Profile

Long-term positioning is defined by the relationship between the current P/E of 22.79 and the intrinsic value estimate of $450-$475. The thesis remains structurally sound as long as operating margins stay above 35% and the debt-to-equity ratio remains below 1.2. Compounding potential is tied to consistent free cash flow generation.

An Analyst's First Look

Five numbers professional analysts usually check before anything else. Tap a card to jump to that line in the tables below.

💬 What Stands Out Here

The tables below also show top-tier ratings for Operating Margin (%), Revenue Growth Rate (YoY %), Net Income Growth Rate (YoY %) — strengths worth noticing. The tables below also show bottom-tier ratings for Total Asset Turnover — weak spots worth a closer look.

Earnings vs. Analyst Estimates

Grew revenue year over year in 8 of 8 recent quarters (growth swung by about 2 points quarter to quarter); beat consensus in 8 of 8, surprises widening.

A quick read on how consistently recent quarters grew and how often reported results cleared analyst consensus — a look back at the track record, not a forecast.

Next scheduled earnings report: 2026-07-29

2024 Q3 Beat +0.7%
2024 Q4 Beat +6.5%
2025 Q1 Beat +2.5%
2025 Q2 Beat +7.5%
2025 Q3 Beat +8.3%
2025 Q4 Beat +12.5%
2026 Q1 Beat +6.2%
2026 Q2 Beat +5.2%

Each chip is one reported quarter: whether earnings per share came in above ("Beat"), below ("Miss"), or in line with the average analyst estimate at the time, and by what percentage. This is a historical record of past reports, not an indicator of future results.

Financial Statement Vertical Analysis (3-Year Ratio Summary)

Calculates structural allocation and relative weights. Balance Sheet items are scaled against Total Assets; Income Statement items are scaled against Total Revenues.

Show Quarters:
Financial Parameter 2023 Q2 ($M) 2023 Q3 ($M) 2023 Q4 ($M) 2024 Q1 ($M) 2024 Q2 ($M) 2024 Q3 ($M) 2024 Q4 ($M) 2025 Q1 ($M) 2025 Q2 ($M) 2025 Q3 ($M) 2025 Q4 ($M) 2026 Q1 ($M) Health Rating Trend
Total Revenue? 56,189.0 56,517.0 62,020.0 61,858.0 64,727.0 65,585.0 69,632.0 70,066.0 76,441.0 77,673.0 81,273.0 82,886.0 Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Operating Income? 24,254.0 (43.2%) 26,895.0 (47.6%) 27,032.0 (43.6%) 27,581.0 (44.6%) 27,925.0 (43.1%) 30,552.0 (46.6%) 31,653.0 (45.5%) 32,000.0 (45.7%) 34,323.0 (44.9%) 37,961.0 (48.9%) 38,275.0 (47.1%) 38,398.0 (46.3%) Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Net Income?Key 20,081.0 (35.7%) 22,291.0 (39.4%) 21,870.0 (35.3%) 21,939.0 (35.5%) 22,036.0 (34.0%) 24,667.0 (37.6%) 24,108.0 (34.6%) 25,824.0 (36.9%) 27,233.0 (35.6%) 27,747.0 (35.7%) 38,458.0 (47.3%) 31,778.0 (38.3%) Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Total Assets? 411,976.0 445,785.0 470,558.0 484,275.0 512,163.0 523,013.0 533,898.0 562,624.0 619,003.0 636,351.0 665,302.0 694,228.0 Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Total Liabilities? 205,753.0 (49.9%) 225,071.0 (50.5%) 232,290.0 (49.4%) 231,123.0 (47.7%) 243,686.0 (47.6%) 235,290.0 (45.0%) 231,203.0 (43.3%) 240,733.0 (42.8%) 275,524.0 (44.5%) 273,275.0 (42.9%) 274,427.0 (41.2%) 279,861.0 (40.3%) Tier 3 (Strong)
Total Equity? 206,223.0 (50.1%) 220,714.0 (49.5%) 238,268.0 (50.6%) 253,152.0 (52.3%) 268,477.0 (52.4%) 287,723.0 (55.0%) 302,695.0 (56.7%) 321,891.0 (57.2%) 343,479.0 (55.5%) 363,076.0 (57.1%) 390,875.0 (58.8%) 414,367.0 (59.7%) Tier 3 (Strong)
Swipe → to see more quarters

Key Financial Ratio Categorization

Show Quarters:
Ratio Category Metric 2023 Q2 2023 Q3 2023 Q4 2024 Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2025 Q1 2025 Q2 2025 Q3 2025 Q4 2026 Q1 Health Rating Trend
Profitability ROE (%)?Key 9.74 10.10 9.18 8.67 8.21 8.57 7.96 8.02 7.93 7.64 9.84 7.67 Tier 6 (Fair)
ROA (%)? 4.87 5.00 4.65 4.53 4.30 4.72 4.52 4.59 4.40 4.36 5.78 4.58 Tier 5 (Moderate)
Operating Margin (%)?Key 43.17 47.59 43.59 44.59 43.14 46.58 45.46 45.67 44.90 48.87 47.09 46.33 Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Stability Debt-to-Equity?Key 1.00 1.02 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.76 0.75 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.68 Tier 3 (Strong)
Current Ratio? 1.77 1.66 1.22 1.24 1.27 1.30 1.35 1.37 1.35 1.40 1.39 1.28 Tier 4 (Good)
Growth Revenue Growth Rate (YoY %)?Key N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.20 16.04 12.27 14.13 14.93 15.59 16.67 17.87 Tier 2 (Excellent)
Net Income Growth Rate (YoY %)? N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.74 10.66 10.23 12.13 15.54 15.91 28.58 29.58 Tier 2 (Excellent)
Activity Total Asset Turnover? 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Tier 9 (High Risk)
Valuation (Current) P/E Ratio (Trailing)? 22.79 Tier 4 (Good)
P/B Ratio? 6.89 Tier 6 (Fair)
EV/EBITDA? 14.67 Tier 3 (Strong)
Trailing EPS ($)? 16.86 Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Swipe → to see more quarters

Business quality at a glance

💬 In Plain English

A quick read on how good the business is underneath the share price: how much of each sale it keeps, how much cash it turns that into, how well it earns on the money invested, and how comfortably it carries its debt. Each figure is on a trailing-twelve-month basis, with the trend across recent quarters.

Metric TTM Health Rating Trend
Gross margin? 68.3% Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Return on invested capital (ROIC)? 23.2% Tier 2 (Excellent)
Free cash flow margin? 22.9% Tier 2 (Excellent)
FCF conversion? 58.2% Tier 5 (Moderate)
Interest coverage? 52.7× Tier 1 (Outstanding)
Net debt / EBITDA? 0.5× Tier 2 (Excellent)

Trailing-twelve-month figures from reported financials, shown for education, not as advice. A metric is omitted when the underlying data isn't available.

Fundamental Momentum Score

💬 In Plain English

A nine-point checklist of whether the fundamentals are getting stronger or weaker year over year — grouped into profitability, leverage and liquidity, and efficiency. Each dot is one test the company either passes or fails; more filled dots means more of the checks are trending the right way. It describes momentum in the reported numbers, not a signal to act on.

6/9

6/9 — improving quality across profitability

  • Positive net income Net income is positive.
  • Positive operating cash flow Operating cash flow is positive.
  • Return on assets improving Return on assets rose to 18.0% from 17.2%.
  • Cash flow exceeds net income Operating cash flow exceeds net income (earnings backed by cash).
  • Long-term debt ratio falling No long-term debt on the balance sheet.
  • Current ratio rising Current ratio did not rise.
  • No share dilution Share count fell 0.1% over the past year.
  • Gross margin rising Gross margin did not widen.
  • Asset turnover rising Asset turnover did not rise.

Each check compares the latest period with a year earlier using reported financials, and is shown for education, not as advice. A check whose data is missing counts as not passed.

🛡️ Financial Health Rating System (Tiers 1-10)

Each financial metric is evaluated dynamically against standard industry benchmarks, mapping from Tier 1 (Outstanding) to Tier 10 (Critical Risk).

Tier 1 - 3: Strong / Outstanding
Excellent financial structure, high profitability, or extremely conservative debt cushion.
Tier 4 - 7: Moderate / Fair
Average operating efficiency, normal leverage ratios, or steady but low growth rates.
Tier 8 - 10: Weak / High Risk
Negative margins, excessive financial leverage, or critical short-term liquidity bottlenecks.

Product & Service Quality

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft remains a tech powerhouse with highly profitable software and cloud services. While recent profits dipped slightly, the company maintains a strong financial foundation and continues to lead in essential business technology.

Ecosystem Summary: Microsoft generates revenue through three main pillars: Intelligent Cloud (Azure), Productivity and Business Processes (Office, LinkedIn), and More Personal Computing (Windows, Gaming). These segments provide a diversified income stream across enterprise and consumer markets.

Customer Feedback: The company enjoys high brand loyalty, particularly among corporate clients who rely on its ecosystem for daily operations. High retention rates are driven by the essential nature of its software and the seamless integration of its various services.

Competitor Grid: Microsoft competes primarily with Amazon and Google in cloud services, and Apple in personal computing. It differentiates itself through deep enterprise integration and a comprehensive software stack that makes switching costs high for business customers.

Pipeline Strategy: Microsoft’s R&D strategy is heavily focused on artificial intelligence and machine learning. By integrating AI into Azure and its productivity tools, the company aims to secure long-term growth and maintain its competitive edge in the tech sector.

Economic Moat Strength

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft retains a powerful market position because its software and cloud services are deeply embedded in almost every business worldwide. This creates a 'moat,' or a protective barrier that makes it very difficult for competitors to steal their customers, ensuring the company remains a dominant force for years to come.

Moat Rating: Wide Moat

Microsoft possesses a Wide Moat that is highly durable. Given its foundational role in global enterprise infrastructure and its aggressive leadership in AI, the company is well-positioned to maintain its competitive advantage for the next 10-20 years. Its ability to lock in customers through essential software and cloud services provides a stable, long-term foundation for growth.

Moat Sub-elements:

🌐 Network Effects: The value of Microsoft’s ecosystem grows as more people use it. Because Windows, Office, and Teams are the industry standards, businesses benefit from seamless collaboration and compatibility. This creates a virtuous cycle where the ubiquity of their tools makes them the default choice for new companies, reinforcing their dominance in the professional software market.
🛡️ Switching Costs: For most enterprises, moving away from Microsoft is prohibitively expensive and operationally risky. The deep integration of Azure, Office 365, and Windows into daily workflows creates 'sticky' customers. Replacing these systems would require massive retraining, data migration, and potential downtime, which keeps customers locked into the ecosystem for the long term.
⚖️ Economies of Scale: Microsoft leverages its massive scale to spread the high costs of developing AI and cloud infrastructure across millions of global users. This allows the company to offer competitive pricing while maintaining industry-leading profitability. As they add more users to Azure, the marginal cost of serving each additional customer continues to decline, further widening their competitive advantage.
📜 Intellectual Property & Brand: Microsoft possesses a vast portfolio of patents, proprietary software code, and brand equity that is nearly impossible to replicate. Their strategic investments in AI, particularly through partnerships, provide a technological edge that is protected by significant R&D spending. This intellectual moat ensures that competitors struggle to match the functionality and security of Microsoft’s core product offerings.

Industry & SWOT Analysis

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft remains a dominant tech giant with massive, steady profits from its cloud and software businesses. While recent earnings show some short-term volatility, the company’s strong financial health and essential role in corporate infrastructure keep it in a powerful position.

Definition: Microsoft operates in the Software - Infrastructure industry, providing essential cloud computing, enterprise software, and business productivity tools that serve as the digital backbone for global organizations.

Market Positioning: Microsoft is a market leader in cloud infrastructure and enterprise software. It competes primarily with Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud, differentiating itself through deep integration across its Office, Dynamics, and Azure ecosystems.

💪 Strengths
  • High operating margins
  • dominant enterprise software ecosystem
  • strong cloud infrastructure
⚠️ Weaknesses
  • Recent net income volatility
  • high reliance on cloud growth
  • significant debt obligations
🚀 Opportunities
  • Expansion of AI-integrated business tools
  • growth in cloud platform services
  • increased enterprise digital transformation
🔥 Threats
  • Intense competition from hyperscalers
  • potential regulatory scrutiny
  • rapid technological obsolescence

Management & Corporate Governance

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is a highly profitable tech giant that manages its money effectively. While its recent earnings took a slight dip, the company maintains a strong competitive position and continues to reward shareholders through consistent buybacks and dividends.

Background & Experience: CEO Satya Nadella is widely credited with transforming Microsoft into a cloud-first, AI-driven powerhouse. His long tenure has fostered a culture of stability and strategic focus, earning him significant respect among institutional investors and industry peers.

Capital Allocation: Management demonstrates exceptional operational discipline, maintaining robust operating margins consistently above 45%. They prioritize high-return R&D investments and strategic acquisitions, while steadily reducing debt levels to strengthen the balance sheet against future market volatility.

Innovation Adaptability: Microsoft excels at pivoting, successfully transitioning from legacy software to dominant cloud and AI platforms. Their ability to integrate cutting-edge technology into existing enterprise ecosystems ensures they remain essential to global business infrastructure.

Governance Risk: The primary risk is 'key man' dependency on Nadella’s strategic vision. Additionally, the massive scale of the company invites ongoing regulatory scrutiny regarding antitrust concerns, which could potentially limit future M&A activity or operational flexibility.

Shareholder Alignment (Lynch & Munger): Management shows a moderate owner-oriented mindset through consistent share buybacks. While insider reduction slightly outweighs accumulation, this is common for large-cap executives. The company prioritizes long-term value creation over aggressive, short-term stock price manipulation.

Insider Trading & Capital Allocation (Buybacks)

TTM Stock Repurchases
$22.24B
Buyback Yield (TTM)
0.78%
Total Shareholder Yield
0.78%
1-Year Share Contraction
+0.11%
6-Month Net Insider Activity
-31,083
Insider Ownership %?
≈ 0.032%

👥 Latest Tracked Insider Transactions

Date Insider / Position Type Shares Value ($)
2026-07-01
Hogan Kathleen T
officer
0 -
2026-06-15
Jolla Alice L.
officer: Chief Accounting Officer
A-Award 5,004 -
2026-06-15
Coleman Amy
officer: EVP, Chief Human Resources Off
F-InKind 35 $14,045
2026-06-11
Walmsley Emma N
director
A-Award 2 -
2026-06-11
Rainey John D
director
A-Award 0 -
2026-06-11
PRITZKER PENNY S
director
A-Award 33 -
2026-06-11
Mason Mark
director
A-Award 0 -
2026-06-11
PETERSON SANDRA E
director
A-Award 61 -
2026-06-11
MacGregor Catherine
director
A-Award 5 -
2026-06-11
List Teri
director
A-Award 53 -
Alignment Quality Grade
4/10
Neutral Alignment (Quiet Transactions & Stable Share Count)
📈 Quarterly Shares Outstanding Trend

Valuation & Margin of Safety Analysis

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is currently priced attractively compared to its industry peers, suggesting the market may be underestimating its long-term potential. The company maintains strong profitability and manageable debt, providing a solid foundation for investors looking for stability in the tech sector.

Valuation Verdict: The stock is Undervalued. Microsoft trades at a significant discount to its peer group on both P/E and P/S multiples, despite maintaining superior operating margins near 46%. This suggests the market is not fully pricing in the company's dominant market position and consistent profitability, making it an attractive entry point relative to industry competitors.

💎 Estimated Intrinsic Value: Using an Earnings Power Value (EPV) approach, which assumes no future growth to be conservative, we take the average annual operating income of ~$150B and adjust for taxes and capital costs. With a cost of capital of 8%, the estimated intrinsic value is approximately $450-$475 per share, suggesting the current price is below its fundamental worth.
🛡️ Margin of Safety Cushion: The margin of safety—the gap between the intrinsic value and the current price—is roughly 15-20%. This provides a meaningful cushion for investors, as the stock is trading at a discount to its estimated fundamental value, reducing the risk of permanent capital loss if growth slows slightly.
📊 John Neff Terminal Relationship: Assuming a conservative 10% earnings growth rate and a 1% dividend yield, the calculation is (10 + 1) / 22.79, resulting in a ratio of 0.48. While this is below Neff's ideal 1.0-2.0 threshold, it remains competitive for a large-cap software giant, indicating the stock is reasonably priced relative to its growth prospects.
📈 PEG Ratio (P/E relative to Growth): With a P/E of 22.79 and an estimated long-term growth rate of approximately 10-12%, the PEG ratio sits near 2.0. While a PEG below 1.0 is the gold standard for 'cheap' growth, a ratio of 2.0 is common for high-quality, stable tech leaders, suggesting the stock is fairly valued for its growth profile.

Stock Categorization Framework

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is a massive, reliable company that provides essential software and cloud services to businesses worldwide. It acts as a steady anchor for investors because it generates consistent profits and maintains a strong financial position, even when the broader economy faces uncertainty.

Framework Archetype:
  • Slow Growers Large, mature companies that grow slowly but often pay steady dividends.
  • Stalwarts Big, established firms with dependable, moderate growth. this stock
  • Fast Growers Smaller, aggressive companies expanding quickly — higher risk and reward.
  • Cyclicals Sales and profits rise and fall with the broader economy.
  • Turnarounds Troubled companies that could recover — or stumble further.
  • Asset Plays Assets (cash, property) may be worth more than the share price suggests.
🔍 Classification Rationale: Microsoft exhibits the classic characteristics of a Stalwart: large-cap market dominance, consistent profitability with operating margins consistently exceeding 40%, and a stable balance sheet. While revenue growth is steady rather than explosive, the company’s deep integration into enterprise infrastructure provides a defensive moat that protects earnings during market volatility.
🎯 Analysis Focus Area: Analysis focuses on the sustainability of high operating margins and the P/E ratio relative to historical norms. Monitoring the dividend payout ratio and the consistency of free cash flow generation is essential to ensure the company maintains its ability to reward shareholders while funding ongoing research and development.
📊 Structural Weakness Indicators: The investment thesis for a Stalwart weakens if the P/E ratio expands significantly beyond historical averages while earnings growth decelerates below 5% annually. Additionally, a structural risk emerges if the debt-to-equity ratio exceeds 1.2 or if the operating margin contracts below 35% for consecutive quarters, signaling a potential erosion of the company's competitive advantage.

Asymmetric Risk-Reward Analysis

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is a massive, highly profitable tech company that provides essential software and cloud services to businesses worldwide. While its recent earnings have fluctuated, its strong market position and steady income streams provide a solid foundation for its long-term financial health.

Asymmetry Verdict:
  • Highly Favorable Asymmetry Potential upside looks much larger than the potential downside.
  • Moderate Asymmetry A reasonable balance — some cushion, with upside roughly in line with risk. this stock
  • Symmetric / High Risk Downside risk is as large as, or larger than, the possible reward.
🔍 Business Simplicity: The business model is highly established and transparent, centered on recurring revenue from enterprise software suites and cloud infrastructure. It operates in well-defined, dominant niches with high barriers to entry, making the core operations predictable rather than speculative.
⛈️ Industry Distress Check: The industry is not distressed; it is a high-growth, essential sector. The company maintains a premium valuation rather than a deep-bargain status, reflecting its status as a market leader rather than a misunderstood or cyclical value play.
🛡️ Downside Protection Cushion: Structural buffers include a robust balance sheet with $414B in equity against $125B in total debt, resulting in a conservative 0.68 debt-to-equity ratio. High operating margins exceeding 46% and consistent cash flow generation from recurring cloud subscriptions provide significant protection against short-term revenue volatility.
🚀 Upside Catalyst Potential: Upside is driven by potential margin expansion through economies of scale in cloud infrastructure and the integration of advanced AI tools into the existing enterprise software ecosystem. Revenue CAGR acceleration remains possible as the company continues to capture market share in the high-growth Intelligent Cloud segment.

How it compares to peers

💬 In Plain English

The same company set side by side with close competitors, so its size and valuation have context.

Company Market cap P/EP/S
Microsoft Corporation This stock
MSFT
$2.86T 22.89.0
Apple Inc.
AAPL
$4.64T 37.910.3
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
DOCN
$14.70B 62.115.5
Fortinet, Inc.
FTNT
$119.96B 61.416.9
GoDaddy Inc.
GDDY
$11.63B 13.42.3
Peer median 49.612.9
vs. peers −54.1%−30.4%

P/E (price-to-earnings) is the share price divided by earnings per share — a rough gauge of how expensive a stock is relative to its profits.

The "vs. peers" row shows how the company's valuation multiples compare to the peer median — green is a discount (cheaper than peers), red a premium (more expensive).

Cheap or dear vs. its own history

💬 In Plain English

The peer table shows how the company is priced against rivals; this shows how it is priced against its own past. Each bar places today's multiple within the range it has traded over the window below — near the left is cheap for this stock, near the right is dear.

P/E 22.8 — 11th percentile of its own 2-yr range

21.9 cheaper than usual 37.7

EV/EBITDA 14.7 — 11th percentile of its own 2-yr range

14.1 cheaper than usual 25.6

Middle-half range (25th–75th percentile)

Each quarter-end multiple pairs that quarter's trailing-twelve-month earnings or EBITDA with the period-end price; the marker is where today's multiple sits within that history. Shown for education, not as advice, and only when enough history is available.

Dividend

0.88% Dividend yield
$3.40 Annual dividend / share
20.2% Payout ratio
16 Years of payments
22.4% Dividend growth (annualized)
Quarterly Pays

Annual dividend as a percentage of the share price — your cash return from dividends alone. Share of earnings paid out as dividends. Below ~60% generally leaves room to keep paying and growing it.

Interactive Fair Value Calculator

💬 In Plain English

Drag the sliders to set your own assumptions and watch the estimated fair value update live. Fair value is what the business could be worth based on the cash it generates — a discounted cash flow (DCF) estimate, not a price target.

How fast you expect free cash flow to grow each year.
Your required annual return — higher means you demand a bigger margin, lowering fair value.
The modest perpetual growth rate after year 10.
Estimated fair value / share $480.84 Below your fair value
Current price: $384.36

At today's price the market is implying ~15.0%/yr free-cash-flow growth for 10 years; the company's trailing free-cash-flow growth was 5.1%.

A simplified, transparent model for learning — it isn't financial advice, and small input changes move the result a lot. That sensitivity is the point: it shows how much a valuation depends on assumptions.

Technical Read (Synthesized Signal)

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is currently in a holding pattern, trading near the middle of its recent price range as it recovers from a significant decline. The lack of clear direction suggests the stock is finding its footing, with investors waiting for a new catalyst to determine the next move.

Neutral consolidation phase with nascent bullish momentum and elevated volume.

Microsoft exhibits a structural pause, characterized by price stabilization near the median of its Bollinger Bands. While the MACD indicates a nascent bullish shift, the lack of a definitive moving average crossover suggests a lack of directional conviction. The stock remains significantly depressed from its annual peak, currently occupying the lower quartile of its 52-week range. Expanding volume amidst decoupled price action points to a period of retail consolidation rather than institutional accumulation. This confluence of indicators suggests a market in transition, where the absence of trend strength is offset by a reduction in downside volatility. The current posture reflects a base-building process, as the asset attempts to reconcile its recent performance decline with a neutral momentum profile.

Market Structure

52-Week Range Position

17% (-30.8% from high)

Trailing Returns (1M / 3M / 6M)

-6.6% +2.7% -19.7%

Volatility Regime

Normal Volatility

MA Extension (vs SMA20 / SMA60)

+0.8% -5.5%

Historical Technical Price Chart (120-Day Daily view)

Moving Average Alignment

Arrange Structure: Mixed

Crossover Signals: Neutral (No recent crossover)

SMA(5): $386.75 • SMA(20): $381.13 • SMA(60): $406.88

Technical Indicator Oscillators

RSI (14-day): Neutral (52.8)

MACD Line: Weak Bullish (MACD Line crossed above Signal Line but remains below 0)

Bollinger Bands: Upper $405.14 • Mid $381.13 • Lower $357.11

Volume Trend & Price-Volume Relationship

Volume Trend Profile: Expanding Volatility (10-day volume is 21.1% higher than 30-day average)

Price-Volume Correlation: Weak/No Correlation (-0.08): Price changes and volume fluctuations are decoupled, indicating retail consolidation.

Recent Volume Anomalies (Volume spikes > 2.5x 20-Day Average)

Trigger Date Spike Volume Multiplier Close Price Price Change (%)
2026-06-26 186,201,632 3.72x $372.97 +5.71%
2026-01-29 128,855,323 4.02x $433.50 -9.99%
2025-12-19 70,836,105 2.60x $485.92 +0.40%
2025-07-31 51,617,326 2.86x $533.50 +3.95%

Sentiment Trends & News

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is facing a challenging period as it balances massive AI investments with rising environmental costs and legal scrutiny. While the company remains a leader in technology, the stock is currently cooling off as investors weigh these long-term growth bets against immediate operational hurdles.

Integrated Sentiment Verdict: The sentiment is predominantly bearish due to the combination of environmental concerns and legal headlines. While some analysts remain optimistic about long-term AI potential, the current news cycle is dominated by operational and regulatory headwinds.

Market psychology is currently defensive. With the stock trading near the lower end of its yearly range and facing negative headlines, the near-term expectation is for continued volatility as investors wait for clearer signs of AI profitability.

Market Psychology Breakdown:

  • News headlines sentiment: The sentiment is predominantly bearish due to the combination of environmental concerns and legal headlines. While some analysts remain optimistic about long-term AI potential, the current news cycle is dominated by operational and regulatory headwinds.
  • Retail forum buzz: Retail investor sentiment is cautious and skeptical. Discussions are heavily focused on the stock's recent price decline and the potential risks associated with the company's aggressive AI spending and environmental footprint.
  • Key debate themes: Debate is intense regarding the sustainability of the AI buildout. Investors are questioning whether the high costs of data centers and the resulting carbon emissions will eventually impact profit margins and long-term stock performance.

Recent Tracked News Headlines:

Macroeconomics & Economic Cycle

💬 In Plain English

Microsoft is a massive, stable tech giant that powers the digital infrastructure for most of the world's businesses. While its recent profits have fluctuated, its strong cash position and essential software services provide a solid foundation for long-term growth.

Economic Cycle alignment: Microsoft acts as a growth-oriented company with defensive characteristics due to its essential, subscription-based software services. During economic expansions, businesses increase their cloud and software spending, boosting revenue. In downturns, its products remain critical for business operations, providing a buffer that makes the stock more resilient than pure-play cyclical companies.

Impact of Macro Indicators:

GDP, Inflation, Interest Rates: Microsoft’s massive cash reserves and manageable debt levels ($125.4B) insulate it from high interest rates. Because the company retains significant cash, it often earns substantial interest income that offsets its interest expenses. Stable GDP growth supports corporate IT spending, which is the primary driver of Microsoft’s cloud and software revenue.

Policy & Regulations:

Microsoft faces significant regulatory scrutiny regarding antitrust concerns and its heavy investment in AI. Fiscal policies favoring domestic technology manufacturing and data center expansion provide tailwinds. However, global regulatory pressure on data privacy and AI ethics remains a persistent compliance cost that could impact operational margins.

Social & Demographic tailwinds:

As a B2B-focused powerhouse, Microsoft’s success depends on corporate digital transformation rather than consumer trends. The company benefits from the ongoing enterprise shift toward AI-integrated workflows and cloud-based infrastructure. Its growth is tied to the capital expenditure cycles of global businesses needing to modernize their internal operations and data management.

Global Supply & Exchange risks:

With a vast international footprint, Microsoft is exposed to currency fluctuations that can impact reported revenue when the dollar is strong. Global supply chain complexities, particularly regarding hardware components for data centers, pose risks to scaling its cloud services. Trade regulations regarding AI technology exports also create a complex geopolitical landscape for the firm.